Official Reddit reUnited Clash of Clans forum


    Should inactives get kicked

    Share

    Poll

    Should people that do not attack be kicked

    [ 10 ]
    71% [71%] 
    [ 3 ]
    21% [21%] 
    [ 1 ]
    7% [7%] 

    Total Votes: 14
    avatar
    Gandalf
    Admin

    Posts : 168
    Join date : 2014-02-08
    Location : The Netherlands

    Should inactives get kicked

    Post by Gandalf on Mon 19 May 2014, 04:59

    Should people that do not attack in Clan Wars get kicked?
    avatar
    BallsJr

    Posts : 43
    Join date : 2014-04-08
    Location : Michigan, USA

    Re: Should inactives get kicked

    Post by BallsJr on Mon 19 May 2014, 06:51

    I think if they don't attack (try to get the most amount of stars on a base that can get improvement) both times in 3 straight wars, they should be kicked. If they snipe 3 wars in a row, then they're kicked. They have to try with both attacks in 1/3 wars.

    nobius

    Posts : 3
    Join date : 2014-02-22

    Re: Should inactives get kicked

    Post by nobius on Mon 19 May 2014, 09:27

    I think if they are inactive for two straight clan wars then they should be kicked.
    avatar
    Ron Mexico 88

    Posts : 84
    Join date : 2014-02-08
    Location : Texas!

    Re: Should inactives get kicked

    Post by Ron Mexico 88 on Tue 20 May 2014, 06:55

    3 clan wars is hard to keep up with because I think the details get deleted after two. I kind of like the Idea of 2 clan wars. Having 2 clan wars a week and if you don't participate in any of them then you are out.
    avatar
    brasser united

    Posts : 13
    Join date : 2014-02-09
    Age : 20
    Location : Netherlands

    Re: Should inactives get kicked

    Post by brasser united on Tue 20 May 2014, 09:03

    Imo having 2 clan wars a week and having to participate in them to not get kicked is a bit much. I'm pretty sure this is an unpopular opinion but I'd like 1 cw every 2 weeks. And then when we do have one, we get everyone to fully go for it. If it is noticeable that someone doesnt participate in the wars most of the time (2/3 wars) they get kicked. You said you can't keep track cuz logs disappear, but you can remember it when somebody simply doesn't usually participate in them.
    avatar
    brasser united

    Posts : 13
    Join date : 2014-02-09
    Age : 20
    Location : Netherlands

    Re: Should inactives get kicked

    Post by brasser united on Tue 20 May 2014, 09:05

    Especially since we are originally a farming clan! Let's not forget that
    avatar
    BobTheB0$$_DUCK EDITION

    Posts : 19
    Join date : 2014-02-16
    Age : 102
    Location : In my house... Lol...

    Re: Should inactives get kicked

    Post by BobTheB0$$_DUCK EDITION on Tue 20 May 2014, 09:19

    If they use 1 attack its fine. But if they don't use ANY attacks for a full week, boot time.
    The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message
    avatar
    BallsJr

    Posts : 43
    Join date : 2014-04-08
    Location : Michigan, USA

    Re: Should inactives get kicked

    Post by BallsJr on Thu 22 May 2014, 17:56

    One problem brasser is we were "originally" a farming clan. We're a social clan as far as I know, if we were farming I wouldn't care, but still.
    avatar
    Slackers

    Posts : 113
    Join date : 2014-02-16
    Location : The Netherlands

    Re: Should inactives get kicked

    Post by Slackers on Fri 23 May 2014, 07:45

    I missed out on the poll but here is my input. I think people who do not use BOTH of their attacks for 3 up to 5 wars straight in a row should be kicked. Those are the most inactive persons who imo are most likely not social either so do not really belong in here.

    Sponsored content

    Re: Should inactives get kicked

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sat 23 Sep 2017, 23:13